IS Atlas
isr·1996년 12월 1일

Research Commentary: Diversity in Information Systems Research: Threat, Promise, and Responsibility

Daniel Robey

Information Systems Research

346
피인용
20.9
FWCI
28
IS/마케팅/OM 탑저널 피인용
9
IS/마케팅/OM 탑저널 참고문헌
01Abstract

This paper confirms the evidence of diversity in information systems (IS) research and identifies the ways in which diversity both threatens and advances the field of IS. While advocating diversity within the field of IS, the paper also discusses the responsibilities that must be assumed by IS researchers. Responsibilities include a “disciplined methodological pluralism” (Landry and Banville [Landry, M., C. Banville. 1992. A disciplined methodological pluralism for MIS research. Accounting, Management and Inform. Technologies 2(2, April–June) 77–97.) in which researchers clearly justify their research aims, theories, and methods. Responsibilities also include researchers’ commitment to collaborative ideals.

02연구 흐름

불러오는 중…

03비슷한 논문

불러오는 중…

04이후 연구

불러오는 중…

05선행 연구

불러오는 중…

06서지 정보