Confidence Calibration in a Multiyear Geopolitical Forecasting Competition

This research examines the development of confidence and accuracy over time in the context of forecasting. Although overconfidence has been studied in many contexts, little research examines its progression over long periods of time or in consequential policy domains. This study employs a unique data set from a geopolitical forecasting tournament spanning three years in which thousands of forecasters predicted the outcomes of hundreds of events. We sought to apply insights from research to structure the questions, interactions, and elicitations to improve forecasts. Indeed, forecasters’ confidence roughly matched their accuracy. As information came in, accuracy increased. Confidence increased at approximately the same rate as accuracy, and good calibration persisted. Nevertheless, there was evidence of a small amount of overconfidence (3%), especially on the most confident forecasts. Training helped reduce overconfidence, and team collaboration improved forecast accuracy. Together, teams and training reduced overconfidence to 1%. Our results provide reason for tempered optimism regarding confidence calibration and its development over time in consequential field contexts. This paper was accepted by Yuval Rottenstreich, judgment and decision making.

• 저널Management Science · 63(11) · 3552–3565
• 토픽Forecasting Techniques and Applications · Management Science and Operations Research
• DOI10.1287/mnsc.2016.2525
• 저자Don A. Moore, Samuel A. Swift, Angela Minster, Barbara A. Mellers, Lyle Ungar, Philip E. Tetlock, Heather Hee Jin Yang, Elizabeth R. Tenney