IS Atlas
jmis·1993년 6월 1일

Comparing the Modeling Performance of Regression and Neural Networks as Data Quality Varies: A Business Value Approach

Arun Bansal, Robert J. Kauffman, Rob R. Weitz

Journal of Management Information Systems

105
피인용
7.1
FWCI
3
IS/마케팅/OM 탑저널 피인용
33
IS/마케팅/OM 탑저널 참고문헌
01Abstract

:Under circumstances where data quality may vary (due to inaccuracies or lack of timeliness, for example), knowledge about the potential performance of alternate predictive models can help a decision maker to design a business-value-maximizing information system. This paper examines a real-world example from the fteld of ftnance to illustrate a comparison of alternative modeling tools. Two modeling alternatives are used in this example: regression analysis and neural network analysis.There are two main results: (1) Linear regression outperformed neural nets in terms of forecasting accuracy, but the opposite was true when we considered the business value of the forecast (2) Neural net-based forecasts tended to be more robust than linear regression forecasts as data accuracy degraded. Managerial implications for fmancial risk management of mortgage-backed security portfolios are drawn from the results.

02연구 흐름

불러오는 중…

03비슷한 논문

불러오는 중…

04이후 연구

불러오는 중…

05선행 연구

불러오는 중…

06서지 정보