Preference Elicitation for Participatory Budgeting

Participatory budgeting enables the allocation of public funds by collecting and aggregating individual preferences. It has already had a sizable real-world impact, but making the most of this new paradigm requires rethinking some of the basics of computational social choice, including the very way in which individuals express their preferences. We attempt to maximize social welfare by using observed votes as proxies for voters’ unknown underlying utilities, and analytically compare four preference elicitation methods: knapsack votes, rankings by value or value for money, and threshold approval votes. We find that threshold approval voting is qualitatively superior, and also performs well in experiments using data from real participatory budgeting elections. This paper was accepted by Yan Chen, decision analysis.

• 저널Management Science · 67(5) · 2813–2827
• 토픽Game Theory and Voting Systems · Economics and Econometrics
• DOI10.1287/mnsc.2020.3666
• 저자Gerdus Benadè, Swaprava Nath, Ariel D. Procaccia, Nisarg Shah